Authors

Kierkegaard_Soren

The Reddit account that tried to bring r/bitcoinpuzzles back in 2017 with one funded trivia brainwallet. Twelve riddles and a philosopher's birth year.
IDkierkegaard-soren28 / 32person · 1 collection · 2017-11-04
Subject

Kierkegaard_Soren

bitcoin

Reddit user who tried to revive r/bitcoinpuzzles in 2017 with one funded trivia brainwallet.

Puzzles
1
Prize recorded
0.04 BTC
Still unsolved
0 · -
closed 1 / 1
Channels
redditreddit.com/user/Kierkegaard_Soren
Address
18no9TMRswUaHbi4ecBPjrPEa2KAckaCmH

Log

 

Announced a Bitcoin scavenger hunt of about 0.05 BTC, meant to revive the subreddit and bring in players from outside crypto.

reddit.com/r/bitcoinpuzzles/comments/77g5h7/meta_new_puzzle_in_development_005_btc_eta_is
 

Launched the puzzle at 0.04 BTC instead of the planned 0.05, because the Bitcoin price had gone up.

reddit.com/r/bitcoinpuzzles/comments/7asy51/brainwallet_puzzle_004_btc_reward
 

Asked for donations to future puzzles at 18no9TMRswUaHbi4ecBPjrPEa2KAckaCmH in an edit after the claim.

reddit.com/r/bitcoinpuzzles/comments/7asy51/brainwallet_puzzle_004_btc_reward

Who this is

A Reddit account named after a Danish philosopher. That's all we know, and the record doesn't pretend to know more.

October 2017. r/bitcoinpuzzles is basically dead. The announcement opens with "All (5 of you)", which is honestly the best opening line a subreddit revival could have. The pitch: a hunt of about 0.05 BTC, less technical than usual, so people from outside crypto can play too. Teams welcome.

Two weeks later the trivia brainwallet goes live. Twelve riddles, 0.04 BTC because the price went up in between. One clue asks for the year the author was born. The answer is 1813. That's Søren Kierkegaard's year, not the account holder's. Commitment to the bit, respect.

And then it was over in six hours. Quantris swept it, the author edited in a donation address for future puzzles and wrote "I want to make this a thing." Did it become a thing? Arctic Shift's copy of the account's posts has no second funded puzzle. So the dataset holds 1 of theirs, and it's a good one.

What the record says and what it doesn't

Three facts, all from the account's own posts. The announcement. The launch at 0.04 BTC instead of 0.05. The donation request in the edit after the claim.

The donation address is on the record because the author named it. Nothing ties it to the prize wallet, so the record doesn't invent a link. The name is a pen name and stays one. No real name, no other platform.

The record

tssrc/collections/trivia-brainwallet.ts
static readonly author = party("Kierkegaard_Soren", {
  key: "kierkegaard-soren",
  kind: PartyKind.Person,
  about: "Reddit user who tried to revive r/bitcoinpuzzles in 2017 with one funded trivia brainwallet.",
  addresses: ["18no9TMRswUaHbi4ecBPjrPEa2KAckaCmH"],
  profiles: [profile("reddit", "https://www.reddit.com/user/Kierkegaard_Soren/")],
  facts: [
    fact("Announced a Bitcoin scavenger hunt of about 0.05 BTC, …", ANNOUNCEMENT, { date: "2017-10-19" }),
    fact("Launched the puzzle at 0.04 BTC instead of the planned 0.05, …", THREAD, { date: "2017-11-04" }),
    fact("Asked for donations to future puzzles at 18no9TMRswUaHbi4ecBPjrPEa2KAckaCmH in an edit after the claim.", THREAD),
  ],
});